
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org wrote:
This adds a SPI flash driver which simulates SPI flash clients. Currently supports the bare min that U-Boot requires: you can probe, read, erase, and write. Should be easy to extend to make it behave more exactly like a real SPI flash, but this is good enough to merge now.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mtd/spi/sandbox.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c | 5 + 3 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/spi/sandbox.c
Again would like a few comments / docs. I'm pleased you have done this - it is much more comprehensive than my noddy implementation.
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile index 90f8392..fb37807 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH) += spi_flash.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_ATMEL) += atmel.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_EON) += eon.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_MACRONIX) += macronix.o +COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SANDBOX) += sandbox.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SPANSION) += spansion.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SST) += sst.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO) += stmicro.o diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sandbox.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sandbox.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a1bb641 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sandbox.c @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +/*
- Simulate a SPI flash
- Copyright (c) 2011-2012 The Chromium OS Authors.
- See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
- project.
- Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
- */
+#include <common.h> +#include <malloc.h> +#include <spi.h> +#include <os.h>
+#include <spi_flash.h> +#include "spi_flash_internal.h"
+#include <asm/spi.h>
These are the different commands, right?
+typedef enum {
- SF_CMD, SF_ID, SF_READ, SF_WRITE, SF_ERASE, SF_READ_STATUS, SF_WREN, SF_WRDI,
+} sb_sf_state;
+#define STAT_WIP (1 << 0) +#define STAT_WEL (1 << 1)
What are these? Status bus? If so, perhaps a comment for each?
+struct sb_spi_flash_erase_commands {
- u8 cmd;
- u32 size;
+}; +#define IDCODE_LEN 5 +#define MAX_ERASE_CMDS 2 +struct sb_spi_flash_data {
- const char *name;
- u8 idcode[IDCODE_LEN];
- u32 size;
- const struct sb_spi_flash_erase_commands erase_cmds[MAX_ERASE_CMDS];
+};
+struct sb_spi_flash {
- sb_sf_state state;
- uint off;
- const struct sb_spi_flash_data *data;
- int fd;
- u8 status;
+};
All of the above could do with some comments IMO...
+static const char *sb_sf_state_name(sb_sf_state state) +{
- static const char * const states[] = {
- "CMD", "ID", "READ", "WRITE", "ERASE", "READ_STATUS", "WREN", "WRDI",
- };
I wonder if it would be better to put this array up next to the enum?
- return states[state];
+}
These are the emulated devices I think.
+static const struct sb_spi_flash_data sb_sf_flashes[] = {
- {
- "M25P16", { 0x20, 0x20, 0x15 }, (2 * 1024 * 1024),
- { /* erase commands */
- { 0xd8, (64 * 1024), }, /* sector */
- { 0xc7, (2 * 1024 * 1024), }, /* bulk */
Is <<10, <<20 better? Not sure.
- },
- },
+};
+static u8 sb_sf_0xff[0x10000];
Perhaps we should add an os_fputc() instead? Or perhaps write in smaller chunks?
+static int sb_sf_setup(void **priv, const char *spec) +{
- /* spec = idcode:file */
- struct sb_spi_flash *sbsf;
- const char *file;
- size_t i, len, idname_len;
- const struct sb_spi_flash_data *data;
- file = strchr(spec, ':');
- if (!file)
- goto error;
- idname_len = file - spec;
- ++file;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sb_sf_flashes); ++i) {
- data = &sb_sf_flashes[i];
- len = strlen(data->name);
- if (idname_len != len)
- continue;
- if (!memcmp(spec, data->name, len))
- break;
- }
- if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(sb_sf_flashes)) {
- printf("sandbox_spi_flash: unknown flash '%*s'\n",
- (int)idname_len, file);
- goto error;
- }
- if (sb_sf_0xff[0] == 0x00)
- memset(sb_sf_0xff, 0xff, sizeof(sb_sf_0xff));
- sbsf = malloc(sizeof(*sbsf));
- if (!sbsf)
- goto error;
- sbsf->fd = os_open(file, 02);
- if (sbsf->fd == -1) {
- free(sbsf);
- goto error;
- }
- sbsf->state = SF_CMD;
- sbsf->data = data;
- *priv = sbsf;
- return 0;
- error:
- printf("sandbox_spi_flash: unable to parse client spec\n");
or out of memory or file would not open
- return 1;
+}
+static void sb_sf_free(void *priv) +{
- struct sb_spi_flash *sbsf = priv;
- os_close(sbsf->fd);
- free(sbsf);
+}
+static void sb_sf_cs_deactivate(void *priv) +{
- struct sb_spi_flash *sbsf = priv;
- /* CS is no longer being asserted, so reset state */
- sbsf->state = SF_CMD;
+}
+static int sb_sf_xfer(void *priv, const u8 *tx, u8 *rx,
- uint bytes)
+{
- struct sb_spi_flash *sbsf = priv;
- uint i, written = 0;
- debug("sb_sf: state:%x(%s) bytes:%u\n", sbsf->state,
- sb_sf_state_name(sbsf->state), bytes);
- if (sbsf->state == SF_CMD) {
I wonder if this if() could be split out as it makes the function very long. Might be hard if too many parameters though.
- sb_sf_state oldstate = sbsf->state;
- rx[written++] = 0;
- sb_spi_tristate(rx, 1);
- /*
- * XXX: we assume cmds that need addresses get them in one
- * transfer rather than accumulating ... but u-boot
- * doesn't care at all.
- */
- switch (tx[0]) {
- case CMD_READ_ID:
- sbsf->off = 0;
- sbsf->state = SF_ID;
- break;
- case CMD_PAGE_PROGRAM:
- /* XXX: check WEL in status */
- /*
- * XXX: need to handle exotic behavior:
- * - unaligned addresses
- * - too big of an address
- */
- sbsf->off = (tx[1] << 16) | (tx[2] << 8) | tx[3];
- os_lseek(sbsf->fd, sbsf->off, 0);
- written += 3;
- sb_spi_tristate(&rx[1], 3);
- sbsf->state = SF_WRITE;
- sbsf->status &= ~STAT_WEL;
- break;
- case CMD_READ_ARRAY_SLOW:
- case CMD_READ_ARRAY_FAST: {
- uint alen = 3;
- sbsf->off = (tx[1] << 16) | (tx[2] << 8) | tx[3];
- os_lseek(sbsf->fd, sbsf->off, 0);
- debug(" read addr: %u\n", sbsf->off);
- if (tx[0] == CMD_READ_ARRAY_FAST)
- /* read fast needs a dummy byte */
- ++alen;
- written += alen;
- sb_spi_tristate(&rx[1], alen);
- sbsf->state = SF_READ;
- break;
- }
Are you allowed to not indent the {} in this case? The } ends up at the same level as the switch().
- case CMD_WRITE_DISABLE:
- debug(" write disabled\n");
- sbsf->status &= ~STAT_WEL;
- break;
- case CMD_READ_STATUS:
- sbsf->state = SF_READ_STATUS;
- break;
- case CMD_WRITE_ENABLE:
- debug(" write enabled\n");
- sbsf->status |= STAT_WEL;
- break;
- default:
- /* handle erase commands first */
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_ERASE_CMDS; ++i) {
- const struct sb_spi_flash_erase_commands *erase_cmd =
- &sbsf->data->erase_cmds[i];
- if (erase_cmd->cmd == 0x00)
- continue;
- if (tx[0] != erase_cmd->cmd)
- continue;
- /* XXX: check WEL in status */
- /* verify address is aligned */
- sbsf->off = (tx[1] << 16) | (tx[2] << 8) | tx[3];
- if (sbsf->off & ~(erase_cmd->size - 1)) {
- debug(" sector erase: cmd:%#x needs align:%#x, but we got %#x\n",
- erase_cmd->cmd, erase_cmd->size, sbsf->off);
- sbsf->status &= ~STAT_WEL;
- return 1;
- }
- os_lseek(sbsf->fd, sbsf->off, 0);
- debug(" sector erase addr: %u\n", sbsf->off);
- written += 3;
- sb_spi_tristate(&rx[1], 3);
- /* XXX: latch WIP in status, and delay before clearing it ? */
- os_write(sbsf->fd, sb_sf_0xff, erase_cmd->size);
- sbsf->status &= ~STAT_WEL;
- goto cmd_done;
- }
- debug(" cmd unknown: %#x\n", tx[0]);
- return 1;
- }
- cmd_done:
- if (oldstate != sbsf->state)
- debug(" cmd: transition to %s state\n",
- sb_sf_state_name(sbsf->state));
- }
- if (written == bytes)
- return 0;
- switch (sbsf->state) {
- case SF_ID: {
- const u8 *idcode = sbsf->data->idcode;
- debug(" id: off:%u\n tx:", sbsf->off);
- for (i = sbsf->off; i < IDCODE_LEN; ++i) {
- if (written < bytes) {
- rx[written++] = idcode[i];
- debug(" %02x", idcode[i]);
- } else
- break;
- }
- if (written < bytes) {
- i = bytes - written;
Do you think you should use a different variable than i in this case and below? I doubt it would affect the code output.
- debug(" <memset remaining %u bytes>", i);
- memset(rx + written, 0, i);
- written += i;
- }
- debug("\n");
- break;
- }
- case SF_READ:
- /*
- * XXX: need to handle exotic behavior:
- * - reading past end of device
- */
- i = bytes - written;
- debug(" tx: read(%u)\n", i);
- if (i)
- written += os_read(sbsf->fd, rx + written, i);
- break;
- case SF_READ_STATUS:
- debug(" read status: %#x\n", sbsf->status);
- i = bytes - written;
- memset(rx + written, sbsf->status, i);
- written += i;
- break;
- case SF_WRITE:
- /*
- * XXX: need to handle exotic behavior:
- * - more than a page (256) worth of data
- * - reading past end of device
- */
- i = bytes - written;
- debug(" rx: write(%u)\n", i);
- if (i)
- written += os_write(sbsf->fd, tx + written, i);
- break;
- default:
- debug(" ??? no idea what to do ???\n");
- break;
- }
- return written == bytes ? 0 : 1;
+}
+const struct sb_spi_emu_ops sb_sf_ops = {
- .setup = sb_sf_setup,
- .free = sb_sf_free,
- .cs_deactivate = sb_sf_cs_deactivate,
- .xfer = sb_sf_xfer,
+}; diff --git a/drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c b/drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c index eda0f3e..ae15946 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c @@ -35,10 +35,15 @@ static const char *sb_lookup_arg(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs) return os_getopt(sf_arg, 1); }
+extern const struct sb_spi_emu_ops sb_sf_ops;
static const struct { const char *spec; const struct sb_spi_emu_ops *ops; } sb_emu_map[] = { +#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SANDBOX
- { "sf", &sb_sf_ops, },
+#endif };
static int sb_parse_type(struct sb_spi_slave *sss)
1.7.8.3
Regards, Simon