
On 10/4/2024 6:50 PM, Prasanth Babu Mantena wrote:
From: Santhosh Kumar K s-k6@ti.com
Currently, the allocation of DMA channel[0] for memcpy is happening in udma_transfer() for every transfer, which leads to a huge overhead for each transfer, especially in case of nand page reads. So, move this
[..]
@@ -2590,6 +2565,7 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev) struct udevice *tmp; struct udevice *tisci_dev = NULL; struct udma_tisci_rm *tisci_rm = &ud->tisci_rm;
struct udma_chan *uc; ofnode navss_ofnode = ofnode_get_parent(dev_ofnode(dev));
ud->match_data = (void *)dev_get_driver_data(dev);
@@ -2714,6 +2690,42 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev)
uc_priv->supported = DMA_SUPPORTS_MEM_TO_MEM | DMA_SUPPORTS_MEM_TO_DEV;
- uc = &ud->channels[0];
- switch (ud->match_data->type) {
- case DMA_TYPE_UDMA:
ret = udma_alloc_chan_resources(uc);
break;
- case DMA_TYPE_BCDMA:
ret = bcdma_alloc_chan_resources(uc);
break;
- default:
return -EINVAL;
shouldn't we treat this default case as error and do some dev_err prints ?
- };
- if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, " Channel 0 allocation failure %d\n", ret);
return ret;
No need of this ret
- }
- return 0;
do 'return ret' here
+}
+static int udma_remove(struct udevice *dev) +{
- struct udma_dev *ud = dev_get_priv(dev);
- struct udma_chan *uc = &ud->channels[0];
- switch (ud->match_data->type) {
- case DMA_TYPE_UDMA:
udma_free_chan_resources(uc);
break;
- case DMA_TYPE_BCDMA:
bcdma_free_bchan_resources(uc);
break;
- default:
return -EINVAL;
shouldn't we treat this default case as error and do some dev_err prints ?
- };
- return 0; }
@@ -2855,5 +2867,7 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(ti_edma3) = { .of_match = udma_ids, .ops = &udma_ops, .probe = udma_probe,
- .remove = udma_remove, .priv_auto = sizeof(struct udma_dev),
- .flags = DM_FLAG_OS_PREPARE, };