-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/12 17:22, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps I can make the point another way. Assuming that the SOC in
question is ARM-based and has Linux support it either supports FDT
now or presumably will fairly soon. We found that some of the
things we want to know about at the low level are hardware
properties that are already sit in a node in the FDT. For example
the memory controller may have information about the memory type
attached to it.
Given this, my suggestion is that this hardware information be kept
in one place (FDT) where possible, even if it unfortunately
temporarily needs to be translated into some simpler format as part
of the SPL build for efficiency reasons.
Exactly. The fewer places we have to write down the details the better.
- --
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://www.enigmail.net/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=3dA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
