On 10/01/15 12:34, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Wally Yeh
wally.yeh@atrustcorp.com wrote:
I think u-boot-fslc is support i.mx6q very well now, it booting into kernel only spend 0.3~0.5s.
If you have question which i.mx related, maybe you can also send mail to meta-freescale to ask them. Just for clearness...
Please rely on U-Boot i.MX for it
Clear as mud, chaps :-)
I presume fslc is "mainline", as in git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
This is what I've use thus far and it seems to work well, except a small problem with PCIe
What is u-boot i.mx? googling didn't enlighten me.
This comment worries me:
The U-Boot FSLC tree is used to carry backports of development version over the current released one.
This suggests that u-boot i.imx is using fslc as a dumping ground for stuff they don't want to maintain, rather than treating it as an upstream with which to merge patches. I hope this is not the case? The distinction is subtle, so perhaps I've just misunderstood?
Who is doing the backports? and why is fslc considered "behind" ?
-Ian