Hi Rasmus,
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 05:05, Rasmus Villemoes rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk wrote:
On 19/03/2023 20.29, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Rasmus,
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 13:34, Rasmus Villemoes rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk wrote:
On 18/03/2023 21.20, Simon Glass wrote:
Now, the only way to be really sure is to build the world with/without this patch and check if any .dtb file changes, but I don't have the means to do that. But I do notice that
doc/develop/devicetree/control.rst | 1 + scripts/Makefile.lib | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
There is something missing at the end of your note.
Ah, sorry. I meant to say something about that it seems some existing in-tree cases could make use of this and thus be simplified, e.g. all the t8103-*-u-boot.dtsi just include t8103-u-boot.dtsi, but then I wasn't really sure if that was a proper example, so decided to edit that part out (but left that small fragment in).
What U-Boot-specific things are you using?
Just the u-boot,dm-spl kind of stuff.
With the new bindings, we can put those tags (bootph-...) in the kernel DTs.
Hm, ok, but actually I was a bit too fast, there's also some binman stuff, and a few things that I want/need to do for U-Boot but not the kernel and vice versa (e.g. some gpio-hogs), so all in all, having this patch in would still be very useful to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
I have too many things open at the moment but at some point I will look at upstreaming the binman bindings.
For gpio-hogs, can you send a patch to Linux?
Regards, SImon