On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:56:37PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 30.01.2019 um 22:38 schrieb Jonathan Gray jsg@jsg.id.au:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: Hi Jonathan,
On 30.01.19 15:17, Jonathan Gray wrote: Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray jsg@jsg.id.au
board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644 --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = { DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb", false, },
- [0x10] = {
"Compute Module 3+",DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",Is the dtb name already committed to? I haven't seen patches on the rpi kernel ML.
I didn't see an existing name in various linux trees.
There is currently no new dtb provided with the firmware either, though https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raspberrypi/documentation/master/hardware/... states
"CM3+ modules require a software/firmware image dated November 2018 or newer to function correctly."
So the firmware likely patches bcm2710-rpi-cm3.dtb before passing it on.
Or maybe it's identical to the CM3? It's supposed to be a drop in replacement after all - and the other differences (wifi chip, usb hub) of the 3+ should not apply to a CM.
So I guess either you send a patch to Linux that adds the cm3plus and only changes the compatible/model properties over cm3 or we make the dtb name in this patch the cm3 one.
Alex
Ok, I'll send a v2 with "bcm2837-rpi-cm3.dtb".