Albert,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Prafulla,
In message F766E4F80769BD478052FB6533FA745D1A114670B3@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.com you wrote:
Let's have Wolfgang's opinion on this, since this not aligned with current u-boot development strategy.
May be we can create a separate header file for tracking (unsupported/tobe supported) arm machine-types.
Actually this is for Albert to comment. He is the ARM custodian and has to live with the results.
Wolfgang, Marek Vasut, and I discussed this here [1]. To summarize, by declaring non-mainlined mach_types in the respective board config, an error will be thrown at compile time after mach-types.h is updated to include the mach_type.
The other idea is to have a separate file, say mach-types-local.h where all non-mainlined mach-types would be defined.
Thoughts? I can do whichever.
thx,
Jason.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg60921.html