On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:05:40 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
We have incompatible definitions of the CPU_TYPE_ENTRY for MPC83xx systems:
In "include/asm-ppc/processor.h":
973 #define CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(n, v) \ 974 { .name = #n, .soc_ver = SVR_##v, }
But in "cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c":
47 #define CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(x) {#x, SPR_##x}
This causes ``"CPU_TYPE_ENTRY" redefined'' warnings that need to get fixed.
-> for MPC83xx custodian
you have already pulled a fix for this (commit 4890246a2c5df90a74e2941e3673a49bbd36aee9).
3564 06/09 Kim Phillips [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt_support: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors 3621 06/10 Kumar Gala Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt_support: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors 3630 06/10 Kim Phillips [PATCH v2] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors 3631 06/10 Jerry Van Baren Re: [PATCH v2] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors 3895 06/16 Kim Phillips [PATCH v3] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors 3896 06/16 Kim Phillips [PATCH v4] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors 3925 06/17 Kumar Gala Re: [PATCH v4] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors -> asked submitter about state: resubmit cleaned up version?
I responded to your query in that thread; please go ahead and apply v4 as Kumar's comments are addressed in a separate (85xx) patch.
3935 06/17 Kim Phillips [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] mpc83xx: move CPU_TYPE_ENTRY over to processor.h -> for 83xx custodian
you have already pulled this (same commit as above).
Kim