On 10/11/20 2:35 pm, Tero Kristo wrote:
If the raw PM support is built in, we are operating in the split firmware approach mode where RM and PM support is not available. In this case, skip the board config for these two.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo t-kristo@ti.com
arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c index 78c158c63f..154d2df049 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c @@ -158,11 +158,13 @@ static void k3_sysfw_configure_using_fit(void *fit, ret);
/* Apply power/clock (PM) specific configuration to SYSFW */ +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI
IMHO, using CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI is hack here. Can we showhow derive this information based on the images loaded in FIT?
Thanks and regards, Lokesh
ret = board_ops->board_config_pm(ti_sci, (u64)(u32)cfg_fragment_addr, (u32)cfg_fragment_size); if (ret) panic("Failed to set board PM configuration (%d)\n", ret); +#endif
/* Extract resource management (RM) specific configuration from FIT */ ret = fit_get_data_by_name(fit, images, SYSFW_CFG_RM, @@ -171,12 +173,14 @@ static void k3_sysfw_configure_using_fit(void *fit, panic("Error accessing %s node in FIT (%d)\n", SYSFW_CFG_RM, ret);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI /* Apply resource management (RM) configuration to SYSFW */ ret = board_ops->board_config_rm(ti_sci, (u64)(u32)cfg_fragment_addr, (u32)cfg_fragment_size); if (ret) panic("Failed to set board RM configuration (%d)\n", ret); +#endif
/* Extract security specific configuration from FIT */ ret = fit_get_data_by_name(fit, images, SYSFW_CFG_SEC,