Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:06:53 -0600, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
+c) Relax the -munified-access rule globally. This will prevent native
I assume that's meant to say -munaligned-access?
- until the target gets compiled with m-unaligned-access.
s/m-/-m/
+d) Relax the -munified-access rule only for for files susceptible to
I assume that's meant to say -munaligned-access?
Thanks for spotting these. Fixed in next round.
- the local initialized array issue. This minimizes the quantity of
- code which can hide unwanted misaligned accesses.
+Considering the rarity of actual occurrences (as of this writing, 5 +files out of 7840 in U-Boot, or .3%, contain an initialized local char +array which cannot actually be replaced with a const char*), detection +if the issue in patches should not be asked from contributors.
I assume therefore that option (d) was chosen. Perhaps state this explicitly?
Thanks for pointing out the ambiguity: indeed option d) is the one chosen. Made explicit in next round.
Thanks again!
Amicalement,