Hello Christian,
Christian Riesch wrote:
Hello Heiko, Thank you for your reply. I have just noticed that the patches have already been pulled into arm/next so I guess I am quite late with my comments. I'd like to apologize for this; apparently I need another
No problem. Thanks for your reply!
email filter that also filters for messages containing "am1808" and not only "da850" ;-)
;-)
Which brings me to my next point: AFAIK Texas Instruments's AM18xx SoCs, their OMAP-L138, and their DA850 based devices basically differ only in the DSP/PRU part of the device. If you are (like in u-boot) only interested in the ARM part of chip, they are basically the same device. For some reason the Linux kernel and u-boot support for all these devices is labelled da850... Although I have no hardware to test it, I guess that your DDR memory controller initialization code could be used for the OMAP-L138 and the corresponding Davinci device as well. So since all code in u-boot for the entire device family is labelled da850... I guess your DDR initialization functions should get this prefix as well for consistency. Any comments from the maintainers/TI employees who know these devices better than I do?
Yes of course, such a rename should be done, if somebody has tested it!
bye, Heiko