
Dear Seunghyeon Rhee,
2009/11/10 Minkyu Kang promsoft@gmail.com:
Dear Seunghyeon Rhee,
2009/11/2 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" seunghyeon@lpmtec.com:
Dear Minkyu Kang,
2009/11/2 Minkyu Kang promsoft@gmail.com:
Dear Seunghyeon Rhee
2009/10/31 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" seunghyeon@lpmtec.com:
stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in README and the related CONFIG_* macro definitions. This makes macro CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE no longer necessry. This was introduced and used only by this board for some unclear reason. The definition of this macro is removed because it's not referenced elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Seunghyeon Rhee seunghyeon@lpmtec.com
cpu/arm1176/start.S | 7 +------ include/configs/smdk6400.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm1176/start.S b/cpu/arm1176/start.S index cb891df..1ecb3b9 100644 --- a/cpu/arm1176/start.S +++ b/cpu/arm1176/start.S @@ -241,16 +241,11 @@ mmu_enable: skip_hw_init: /* Set up the stack */ stack_setup: -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE
- ldr sp, =(CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE + CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_SIZE - 0xc)
-#else
- ldr r0, _TEXT_BASE /* upper 128 KiB: relocated uboot */
- ldr r0, =CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE /* base of copy in
DRAM */
this change is unnecessary, TEXT_BASE and CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE must
be same.
That's true for the body of U-Boot but not for SPL, where TEXT_BASE is defined to be '0'. Please refer to board/samsung/smdk6400/config.mk. On the other hand, CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE is always dependent on DRAM's base. In SPL, the base of the code should be '0' (the steppingstone memory) and then the stack is located below '0' - not a valid area. If SPL itself requires no stack, it should be no problem. But start.S calls nand_boot function right after the stack is badly set up in the air.
My test results are like the following: with CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE defined : OK with CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE undefined : - SPL bypassed (U-Boot downloaded to DRAM directly by USB monitor program) : OK - through SPL : Not OK (seems to fail for SPL downloading the code to DRAM)
I think CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE was tested for the case it's defined but not enough for the case it's not defined. Would you check it again?
btw, is there need CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE define?
If you are not sure, why did you use CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE for the case CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE is defined while you use TEXT_BASE otherwise? I think the unnecessary macro definition here is not CONFIG_..._BASE but CONFIG_..._CODE. TEXT_BASE and CONFIG_..._BASE have their own meanings and so both are necessary.
Best regards, Seunghyeon
sub r0, r0, #CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN /* malloc area */ sub r0, r0, #CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE /* bdinfo */ sub sp, r0, #12 /* leave 3 words for abort-stack */
-#endif
clear_bss: ldr r0, _bss_start /* find start of bss segment */ ldr r1, _bss_end /* stop here */ diff --git a/include/configs/smdk6400.h b/include/configs/smdk6400.h index f6e1221..f644cd2 100644 --- a/include/configs/smdk6400.h +++ b/include/configs/smdk6400.h @@ -49,8 +49,6 @@ #define CONFIG_ENABLE_MMU #endif
-#define CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE
#define CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS #define CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG #define CONFIG_INITRD_TAG -- 1.6.2.5
-- Seunghyeon Rhee, Ph.D. / Director LPM Technology Inc. T +82-70-8255-6007 F +82-2-6442-6462 M +82-10-2790-0657 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Thanks for patch :) Minkyu Kang -- from. prom. www.promsoft.net _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
-- Seunghyeon Rhee, Ph.D. / Director LPM Technology Inc. T +82-70-8255-6007 F +82-2-6442-6462 M +82-10-2790-0657 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Tested on the NCP board (s3c6410), and It works fine. I'll wait few days more for this patch's review. Thanks!
Tested-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.kang@samsung.com
Minkyu Kang
from. prom. www.promsoft.net
your patch is line wrapped and the tabs are stripped out. please resend the patch
Thanks Minkyu Kang