Kim Phillips wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:44:18 -0800 (PST) Ron Madrid ron_madrid@sbcglobal.net wrote:
This would allow for more board specific nand_spl boot code. Would something like this be allowed or am I barking up the wrong tree?
I'd rather we find stuff that can be ifdeffed out or moved elsewhere -
That's great if it's possible, but it's a very tight image and we're currently wasting 1/16 of it.
the moment we move something in there, someone will find the need to enhance and grow whatever moved there.
So put something in there that is unlikely to grow, and if it does grow, swap it with something else. I think you've gotten spoiled by the lack of resource constraints. :-)
what was the 4.2 toolchain doing differently than the 4.1 toolchain? maybe that's an area worth looking into.
Agreed, code size regressions with -Os should warrant a bug report.
-Scott