On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 11:15, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jon,
in message 1090252402.10358.21.camel@blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com you wrote:
Right. The first message was rejected as being too large.
Oops? I received it through the list, and it made it into the archives. I don't think it was rejected.
I see that now too, but it didn't arrive for quite some time. I think there was weirdness, so let me look into it a bit here too...
I broke it into two parts that do the same patch and resubmitted it with a -1 and a -2 suffix.
So message 2 + message 3 is the same content as message 1?
Correct.
To make this short: which of your 3 messages shall be added?
Please add all of them as they all apply and are important.
This makes NO sense to me. If I apply the first patch, the other two (part 1 and 2) will not apply any more.
I totally misunderstood you. I thought you were asking which of the three LOG messages should be used.
Please apply either:
- The first patch without the -1 and -2 suffixes, or - The 2nd and 3rd messages with the -1 and -2 suffixes,
as they have the same content.
Sorry for the confusion, jdl