The testReplaceSectionSimple() test is the only one which expects failure. It looks odd in the output and takes time to glance at it to see that all is in fact well. Also it does not check that the right exception is generated.
Use the more common (in binman) approach of checking for an exception.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org ---
tools/binman/ftest.py | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/binman/ftest.py b/tools/binman/ftest.py index 4f696c68600..ac54183c399 100644 --- a/tools/binman/ftest.py +++ b/tools/binman/ftest.py @@ -5712,14 +5712,15 @@ fdt fdtmap Extract the devicetree blob from the fdtmap self.assertIsNotNone(path) self.assertEqual(expected_fdtmap, fdtmap)
- @unittest.expectedFailure def testReplaceSectionSimple(self): """Test replacing a simple section with arbitrary data""" new_data = b'w' * len(COMPRESS_DATA + U_BOOT_DATA) - data, expected_fdtmap, _ = self._RunReplaceCmd( - 'section', new_data, - dts='234_replace_section_simple.dts') - self.assertEqual(new_data, data) + with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as exc: + self._RunReplaceCmd('section', new_data, + dts='234_replace_section_simple.dts') + self.assertIn( + "Node '/section': Replacing sections is not implemented yet", + str(exc.exception))
if __name__ == "__main__":