13 May
2013
13 May
'13
1:43 p.m.
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:24:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Sorry for not spotting this before it was merged in; but now this must be fixed. I'm ok with the wrongly-ulong symbols being changed back to char[], though I would prefer their type to be char[0] if possible, as this is (admittedly marginally) more likely to help the compiler catch accidental dereferencings.
Following the latest exchange with Andreas, and after some tests with eldk42 and a gcc 4.7 toolchain, I amend the previous paragraph: rather than 'char[0]', I suggest using 'struct {}'.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.