2 Feb
2018
2 Feb
'18
4:02 p.m.
On 25 Jan 2018, at 11:09, Bryan O'Donoghue bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org wrote:
On 18/01/18 11:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 18/01/18 01:31, Kever Yang wrote:
I don't think we can reuse IH_TYPE_TEE， it use a optee.img type create by mkimage and it seem use more then one cpu.
Don't really understand what you mean by using more than one CPU - can you give an example in the code ?
bod
So - what's the proposed resolution here ?
Where do we stand on this: can we reuse IH_TYPE_TEE, will be use IH_TYPE_OPTEE or will there be a new IH_TYPE_OPTEE_SPL? This series has been hanging in limbo for the better part of January and it seems as if just a naming issue is holding it back at the moment…
Thanks, Philipp.