Prafulla,
On 03/26/2012 11:58 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due to some HW designs.
I see no feedback from your side on this patch. I think you should go through the marvell tree:
- the spi_claim/release_bus function are already implemented in the SPI subsystem - this patch touches only a kirkwood driver - there is no spi u-boot tree from what I see
Please keep me up to date about the status of this patch
Regards
Valentin
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp valentin.longchamp@keymile.com cc: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.falauto@keymile.com cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com cc: Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com
drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c b/drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c index db8ba8b..058dae2 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/kirkwood_spi.c @@ -86,13 +86,23 @@ void spi_free_slave(struct spi_slave *slave) free(slave); }
-int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) +__attribute__((weak)) int board_spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) { return 0; }
+int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) +{
- return board_spi_claim_bus(slave);
+}
+__attribute__((weak)) void board_spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) +{ +}
void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) {
- board_spi_release_bus(slave);
}
#ifndef CONFIG_SPI_CS_IS_VALID