On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Mario Six mario.six@gdsys.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Chris Packham judge.packham@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Mario Six mario.six@gdsys.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Stefan Roese sr@denx.de wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 14.02.2017 02:48, Chris Packham wrote:
I just tried UART booting db-88f6820-amc with the latest u-boot master and it fails to reach the normal u-boot prompt. I don't know if this affects the normal SPI booting.
I've bisected down to commit 94084eea3bd3 ("tools: kwbimage: Fix dest addr").
Thanks for checking and reporting.
Reverting this gets things working again, but I'm guessing it'll break secure boot. Should the size adjustment be conditional on something?
Might be, not sure.
Does db-88f6820-amc_defconfig need something that the other armada configs have enabled?
I don't think so.
Mario, could you please take a look at this so that we find a solution for the upcoming release?
I'll take a look. The quick-fix solution would be to only do the address adjustment if secure boot is active.
But the weird thing is that the address should not matter for the non-secure boot images, since for them the SPL (which is run from a BIN header) directly loads and starts the main U-Boot, hence the BootROM's image loading process is completely bypassed, and the destination address from the header is never used. Does the db-88f6820-amc do anything different in that regard?
No the amc board is pretty standard. Just doesn't have the extra SATA and PCI-e stuff you get on the bigger GP board.
OK, thanks for clarifying.
Well, I just tried it with our GP board, and it works with and without the address adjustment, as expected.
Caveat: I'm booting from an SD card (I changed the U-Boot config around to build a suitable image). There definitely are *some* differences between the boot flows on different boot mediums (I never got the jump back into the BootROM to work on SD boot, for example). So if you boot from another medium, this might be the problem.
For the AMC board my only option is SPI (still haven't tried that with a "broken" build) and UART. UART definitely fails for me.
And now I have tried SPI and that works. So this is indeed UART specific.
I notice in that commit series you talk about the .img file. But the default build target is u-boot-spl.kwb[1]. That's what I've always loaded onto the armada boards.
The u-boot-spl.kwb is the correct image. But this image contains the u-boot.img as a payload. And since this image has the header prepended, we have to subtract the header size from the destination address, so that the entry point lines up correctly if we want to jump back into the BootROM (which is necessary for secure boot to work). But for boards that don't jump back into the BootROM, this doesn't matter, since the BootROM doesn't actually load the main U-Boot in this case, but the SPL does (and the SPL doesn't care about some address in a SoC-specific header; hence my consternation).
Maybe this is UART boot specific. The addressing is probably a bit special and secure boot probably does not apply. Up to now it's been neat trick that kwboot can patch the image on the fly. Maybe it needs to be a bit smarter. I note that Marvell's build process actually produces a separate -uart version of the image, maybe this is why.