
Hi Amar,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Amar amarendra.xt@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds support for eMMC booting on SMDK5250
Signed-off-by: Amar amarendra.xt@samsung.com
board/samsung/smdk5250/spl_boot.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/spl_boot.c b/board/samsung/smdk5250/spl_boot.c index d8f3c1e..2648b4e 100644 --- a/board/samsung/smdk5250/spl_boot.c +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/spl_boot.c @@ -23,15 +23,40 @@ #include<common.h> #include<config.h>
+#include <asm/arch/clock.h> +#include <asm/arch/clk.h>
+#define FSYS1_MMC0_DIV_VAL 0x0701
Should go in arch/arm/include/... ?
enum boot_mode { BOOT_MODE_MMC = 4,
BOOT_MODE_eMMC = 8, /* eMMC44 */
I think should you use upper case E, although I'm not completely sure.
BOOT_MODE_SERIAL = 20, /* Boot based on Operating Mode pin settings */ BOOT_MODE_OM = 32, BOOT_MODE_USB, /* Boot using USB download */
};
typedef u32 (*spi_copy_func_t)(u32 offset, u32 nblock, u32 dst);
+typedef u32 (*spi_copy_func_t)(u32 offset, u32 nblock, u32 dst);
Should avoid adding typedefs.
+static void set_emmc_clk(void);
+/* +* Set MMC0 clock divisor value. +* So that the mmc0 device operating freq is 50MHz.
Do we only support booting from mmc0? That's fine, but I suggest adding a little comment.
+*/ +static void set_emmc_clk(void) +{
struct exynos5_clock *clk = (struct exynos5_clock
*)EXYNOS5_CLOCK_BASE;
unsigned int addr;
unsigned int div_mmc;
addr = (unsigned int) &clk->div_fsys1;
div_mmc = readl(addr) & ~FSYS1_MMC0_DIV_MASK;
div_mmc |= FSYS1_MMC0_DIV_VAL;
writel(div_mmc, addr);
Can this function go in clock.c?
+}
/*
- Copy U-boot from mmc to RAM:
@@ -43,6 +68,8 @@ void copy_uboot_to_ram(void) spi_copy_func_t spi_copy; enum boot_mode bootmode; u32 (*copy_bl2)(u32, u32, u32);
u32 (*copy_bl2_emmc)(u32, u32);
void (*end_bootop_emmc)(void); bootmode = readl(EXYNOS5_POWER_BASE) & OM_STAT;
@@ -57,6 +84,15 @@ void copy_uboot_to_ram(void) copy_bl2(BL2_START_OFFSET, BL2_SIZE_BLOC_COUNT, CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE); break;
case BOOT_MODE_eMMC:
set_emmc_clk();
end_bootop_emmc = (void *) *(u32
*)EMMC44_END_BOOTOP_FNPTR_ADDR;
copy_bl2_emmc = (void *) *(u32
*)EMMC44_COPY_BL2_FNPTR_ADDR;
I think these are pointers to functions in the IROM. Do they have the same signature? Is it possible to create a table of them somewhere instead of using defines?
copy_bl2_emmc(BL2_SIZE_BLOC_COUNT, CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE);
end_bootop_emmc();
break;
default: break; }
-- 1.7.0.4
Regards, Simon