On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:59:13 -0400 Ben Gardiner bengardiner@nanometrics.ca wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 04:46 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
For now, I guess don't worry about sharing the code.
Plus, I've got some changes to the NAND command/util code I'm about to send out that touch this -- if sharing is going to be a pain, I can go back to the version that only passes back "fits with bad blocks", "fits with no bad blocks", or "doesn't fit", and doesn't deal with 64-bit sizes because it's only used by read/write which is limited by pointer size. That simpler version is 128 bytes smaller in my build.
I imagine you don't have to go back.
I already did; it's smaller and slightly simpler for what it currently needs to do. It would still be easy to switch to using the MTD function later.
-Scott