[RFC v2 0/2] FIT documentation link vs copy

I'm proposing linking the FIT documentation instead of double book keeping it, it does have the disadvantage of making it more difficult to see the documentation especially if offline.

v2: update table of contents instead of removing

Sam Povilus (2): doc: Remove FIT documentation that is elsewhere doc: add missing table of content links

doc/usage/fit/index.rst | 25 +- doc/usage/fit/source_file_format.rst | 682 +-------------------------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 682 deletions(-)