On 07/05/2013 11:23 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:29:46 +0200, Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com wrote:
If we have the following entry in cramfs: => cramfsls -rw-r--r-- 1922689 uImage
cramfsload would also succeed if we try to do: => cramfsload uImage_1 CRAMFS load complete: 1922689 bytes loaded to 0x100000
The old code succeeds if the begin of the filename we search matches with a filename stored in cramfs. But the searched file may have additional characters and is therfore not the file we are looking for. So compare also the length of the filename we search and the filename we found in cramfs. This leads to: => cramfsload uImage_1 can't find corresponding entry CRAMFS LOAD ERROR<0> for uImage_1!
which is the behaviour we want. Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck holger.brunck@keymile.com cc: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de
Can't the commit message above be summarized as follows?
---8<--- "cramfsload uImage_1" succeeds even though the actual file is named "uImage".
Fix file name comparison when one name is the prefix of the other. ---8<---
The demonstrative part of the commit message can go here, below the commit message delimiter '---'.
ok. I'll send a v2.
Regards Holger