Dear Scott Wood,
In message 4A8ACBD0.6060309@freescale.com you wrote:
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
And please correct me if I am wrong, but J-C can't actually pull these patches into his next branch correct?
Right, not yet.
That is because it will require 2 of the NAND patches that I sent a week ago.
Thus you might have to accept the DM355 EVM config update patch as well which actually enables the NAND support.
I could do that with an ACK from JC if it does not depend on anything in his tree -- or I could send Wolfgang a -next pull request and then JC could sync with that.
Jean-Christophe has acked this one - see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/65792/focus=66144
But I'm concerned about direct register accesses. We really should insist on using proper accessor calls.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk