8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
3:14 p.m.
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Dirk Behme dirk.behme@de.bosch.com wrote:
Just for my understanding: Is there a technical reason not to use this errata on single core (solo/sololite)? I.e. do you see any real issues using this errata on solo/sololite?
No real issue. It is unneeded for single core mx6 as explained by Shawn.
My real goal on this series was to enable the other ARM errata available at mx6_common.h for sololite.
While reviewing the errata list, I learned that CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_742230 is not needed for solo/solo-lite, so that's why I came up with this 1/2 patch.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam