On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:39:23AM +0200, Markus Klotzbücher wrote:
Hi,
Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de writes:
in message 87ejlssr7a.fsf@denx.de you wrote:
Ok, if this is what was agreed upon I can live with it. (Don't get me wrong, I don't think this is a big mistake or so, I just fail to see any real benefit beside of beeing more Linux-like)
Both versionshave their pros and cons, so doing it like Linux is probably a reasonable thing.
Ok, then so it be.
So we should put there even on-chip devices supports? Like on-chip USB OHCI controllers and USB devices?
How shall we structure the drivers/usb/ directory? How about something like this:
drivers/usb/host/
- generic and specific host controller drivers (ohci, uhci)drivers/usb/core/
- usb core logicdrivers/usb/storage/
- storage class related codedrivers/usb/input/
- e.g. keyboard support etc.
Since I'm working on USB device I think we need also:
drivers/usb/gadget/
- usb gadget drivers
Also I think we should also move usbtty support there...
As said before it needn't be done in one go, but just to make clear where usb stuff shall be placed from now on.
Currently I'm developing my PXA27x USB device support in cpu/pxa/usbd.c file but as soon as the new tree structure is available I can move it accordingly.
Ciao,
Rodolfo