
1 Jul
2015
1 Jul
'15
5:19 p.m.
Hi Anton,
On 01.07.2015 17:09, Anton Schubert wrote:
Additionally, what would you recommend for the MVEBU_SATA_BASE define as it would be ambiguous after the a38x patch. Why not just use the same name/macro?
I think it would be a bit confusing with MVEBU_SATA0_BASE for A38X and MVEBU_SATA_BASE for AXP in the same header. (As I don't have access to the A38X Spec I don't know how similar they really are)
Do the addresses differ? If not, then please use the same macro and perhaps add a comment, that on AXP this is not AHCI compatible. And on A38x it is.
If the addresses differ, I suggest to use a name like:
MVEBU_AXP_SATA_BASE
Thanks, Stefan