6 Dec
2015
6 Dec
'15
11:08 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:07:44PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of per-revision data.
This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However, it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom