
Hi Johan,
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 17:15, Johan Jonker jbx6244@gmail.com wrote:
Add devfdt_get_addr_size_index_ptr function with the same functionality as devfdt_get_addr_size_index, but instead a return pointer is given.
Suggested-by: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker jbx6244@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com
Changed V5: fix spelling use tabs
drivers/core/fdtaddr.c | 8 ++++++++ include/dm/fdtaddr.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/core/fdtaddr.c b/drivers/core/fdtaddr.c index 91bcd1a2..f5906ff9 100644 --- a/drivers/core/fdtaddr.c +++ b/drivers/core/fdtaddr.c @@ -122,6 +122,14 @@ fdt_addr_t devfdt_get_addr_size_index(const struct udevice *dev, int index, #endif }
+void *devfdt_get_addr_size_index_ptr(const struct udevice *dev, int index,
fdt_size_t *size)
+{
fdt_addr_t addr = devfdt_get_addr_size_index(dev, index, size);
return (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) ? NULL : (void *)(uintptr_t)addr;
Shouldn't this use map_to_sysmem()? We should not cast addresses to pointers.
[..]
Regards, SImon