Hello Clement,
Subject should be ARM: dts: [at91:] sama5d2: ...
On 2/2/22 4:43 PM, Clément Léger wrote:
Add the device-tree node to describe the TCB timer.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger clement.leger@bootlin.com
arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi index 038cd73c03..fc6a4fbe4d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi @@ -700,6 +700,21 @@ clocks = <&h32ck>; };
tcb0: timer@f800c000 {compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-tcb", "simple-mfd";
syscon ?
reg = <0xf800c000 0x100>;clocks = <&tcb0_clk>, <&tcb0_gclk>, <&clk32k>;clock-names = "t0_clk", "gclk", "slow_clk";#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;timer0: timer@0 {compatible = "atmel,tcb-timer";reg = <0>, <1>;};};
I am not happy that the original binding has the interrupts as 'mandatory'. Maybe the binding author did not have more use cases in mind. Anyway I think that it can go to u-boot without this interrupts property as it's surely unused and there is no interrupt controller at the moment in the DT. If nobody has another opinion that is...
Eugen
watchdog@f8048040 { compatible = "atmel,sama5d4-wdt"; reg = <0xf8048040 0x10>;-- 2.34.1