13 Feb
2005
13 Feb
'05
9:22 a.m.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
Okay, the HARD code is twice as long and looks more complicated, but this could - theoretically - also be the fault of the coder, not the hardware.
We're all above average here ;-). Seriously, there isn't much inefficient code in u-boot. About the only thing I can think of is the 8245 I2C code (which is hardware only)... that is an ugly glue-in of some example Mot code so we can Blame Someone Else[tm].
8245 no longer use Motorola code for i2c. So if you want to blame someone, blame me :)
-- Gleb.