Re: [U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.

Tolunay Orkun wrote:

What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of).

I agree with Kumar. We should not defined CONFIG_MPC8349 anywhere until we know we need it. Technically speaking, with the possible exception of errata, there should never be a need for CONFIG_MPC8349.