Hello Stefan,
Testing on a real OCOTEA board will be a great help.
Our target is a custom 440gx board with an OCOTEA port of U-Boot. I will try to do some testing to determine if there are any side affects on our board.
-andrew
Stefan Roese wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 01:17, Andrew Wozniak wrote:
My only concern with the fix is that it will break something else that assumes the timer interval to be 10msec. There are a few "files" that depend on it for timeout operations:
cpu/ppc4xx/440gx_enet.c if ((time_now - time_start) > 3000) <--- 30 sec timo?
This is 440 specific, but in the comments a few lines above 3 seconds timeout is mentioned. So even this seems to be a bug with a 10 ms timer interval.
net/bootp.c bp->bp_secs = htons(get_timer(0) / CFG_HZ); ... BootpID += get_timer(0);
net/tftp.c TftpOurPort = 1024 + (get_timer(0) % 3072);
net/net.c post/rtc.c tools/updater/flash_hw.c
All this is generic code (not 440 spcific), so a 1 ms timer interval is assumed.
Give me a few days and I will test it on an OCOTEA board.
Best regards, Stefan