-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Jason Kridner Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:17 AM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: OMAP3: BeagleBoard: add more expansionboard IDs
[sp] Is it really necessary to mention ARMV7 in the subject line? OMAP3 & BeagbeBoard seem sufficient.
From: Koen Kooi koen@dominion.thruhere.net
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi koen@dominion.thruhere.net Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner jkridner@beagleboard.org
board/ti/beagle/beagle.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/ti/beagle/beagle.c b/board/ti/beagle/beagle.c index d9b6f01..520e57d 100644 --- a/board/ti/beagle/beagle.c +++ b/board/ti/beagle/beagle.c @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ #define TINCANTOOLS_TRAINER 0x04000100 #define TINCANTOOLS_SHOWDOG 0x03000100 #define KBADC_BEAGLEFPGA 0x01000600 +#define LW_BEAGLETOUCH 0x01000700 +#define LCDOG_BRAINMUX 0x01000800 +#define LCDOG_BRAINMUXTOUCH 0x02000800
[sp] Don't see any mechanism to read these values. Assuming the detection mechanism is consistent i.e. no difference due to different eeprom etc. etc.
+#define SF_HARDHAT 0x01000900
[sp] Don't see this used below
#define BEAGLE_NO_EEPROM 0xffffffff
@@ -223,6 +227,18 @@ int misc_init_r(void) MUX_KBADC_BEAGLEFPGA(); setenv("buddy", "beaglefpga"); break;
- case LW_BEAGLETOUCH:
printf("Recognized Liquidware Beagletouch board\n");setenv("buddy", "beagletouch");break;- case LCDOG_BRAINMUX:
printf("Recognized Brainmux LCDog board\n");setenv("buddy", "lcdog");break;- case LCDOG_BRAINMUXTOUCH:
printf("Recognized Brainmux LCDog Touch board\n");setenv("buddy", "lcdogtouch");break;-- 1.5.6.4
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot