Hi Quentin,
On 12/16/24 21:47, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Naoki,
On 12/16/24 1:39 PM, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
Hi Quentin,
On 12/16/24 18:57, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Naoki,
On 12/15/24 2:37 AM, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
Hi Quentin,
Thank you very much for your review!
On 12/13/24 22:11, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Naoki,
On 12/11/24 4:39 AM, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
Radxa ROCK 5C[1] is a Rockchip RK3588S2 based single board computer.
[1] https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? url=https%3A%2F%2Fradxa.com%2Fproducts%2Frock5%2F5c&data=05%7C02%7Cquentin.schulz%40cherry.de%7Cbe7d810ae88f4203af8208dd1ca921c6%7C5e0e1b5221b54e7b83bb514ec460677e%7C0%7C0%7C638698234938145886%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8TcHBC2dV1LzouPSR8%2FICOBVshq9RndgMQS3m3XLwFs%3D&reserved=0
Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki naoki@radxa.com
Changes in v3:
- fix compile error
Changes in v2:
- arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi: remove unused node
- include/configs/rock-5-rk3588s.h: fix include order
arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi | 16 ++++ arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5c-u-boot.dtsi | 6 ++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/Kconfig | 7 ++ board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/Kconfig | 12 +++ board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS | 8 ++ board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/Makefile | 3 + board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/rock-5-rk3588s.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++ configs/rock-5-rk3588s_defconfig | 94 +++++++++++++++
- ++++
doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst | 1 + include/configs/rock-5-rk3588s.h | 15 ++++ 10 files changed, 239 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5c-u-boot.dtsi create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/Kconfig create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/Makefile create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock-5-rk3588s/rock-5-rk3588s.c create mode 100644 configs/rock-5-rk3588s_defconfig create mode 100644 include/configs/rock-5-rk3588s.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/ dts/ rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..be1a2f9ae7bb --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) +/*
- Copyright (c) 2024 Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
- */
+#include "rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi"
+&saradc { + bootph-pre-ram; + vdd-microvolts = <1800000>; +};
+&sdhci { + cap-mmc-highspeed; + mmc-hs200-1_8v; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5c-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/ dts/ rk3588s-rock-5c-u-boot.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..bb1cc9e4a279 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-rock-5c-u-boot.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) +/*
- Copyright (c) 2024 Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
- */
+#include "rk3588s-rock-5-u-boot.dtsi" diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/Kconfig b/arch/arm/ mach- rockchip/rk3588/Kconfig index b5a0e624a532..e1487ecb0464 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588/Kconfig @@ -260,6 +260,12 @@ config TARGET_ROCK_5_ITX_RK3588 Front-panel connectors for audio and case-power, -leds Powered by either 12V, ATX power-supply or PoE +config TARGET_ROCK_5_RK3588S
This should be TARGET_ROCK_5C_RK3588S?
rock-pi-4-rk3399_defconfig uses CONFIG_TARGET_ROCKPI4_RK3399. I'm doing same thing.
config TARGET_ROCKPI4_RK3399 help Support for ROCK Pi 4 board family by Radxa.
Here you say this option is for ROCK 5C only.
Because this is first patch which adds support for ROCK 5C.
That's fine, you could say something like:
Support for ROCK 5 board family by Radxa.
More accurately, "RK3588S based ROCK 5" for now. I'm not sure both RK3588 and RK3588S based boards can be supported.
Currently supports: ROCK 5C
And then we can extend this list whenever someone adds support for a new board of that family, which would make it easy to find with a grep if the board is supported and via which target option.
While this could be a good idea, anything odd needs to be justified in the commit log so that we can follow your train of thoughts.
This patch series only adds support for the ROCK 5C so nothing hints at this being usable/used for other boards from Radxa. Which boards are you planning to support with this option? If the ROCK 5B/ROCK 5 ITX aren't going to be part of it, why and how do I know which of the ROCK 5 is supported by this option?
It's possible to add support for ROCK 5A (RK3588S).
Since it seems you're planning on supporting ROCK 5A with the same target option and we already support ROCK 5A, maybe start this way instead of adding support for ROCK 5C and then migrate ROCK 5A to that?
i.e. adapt ROCK 5A so that it can be reused for ROCK 5C easily, and then add ROCK 5C using the mechanism you would introduce in the ROCK 5A adaptation commit(s)?
What do you think?
I just wanted to add ROCK 5C because dts was added in upstream. But it's okay to do "Adapt ROCK 5A then add ROCK 5C".
Is the ROCK 5T going to be supported by that common target, defconfig and board file as well? What are your plans :)?
I'm thinking to add support for 5B+ and 5T too. But for making single target, it needs "check SoC variant" code in addition to check "Board ID". I guess following code may be used:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20241110005622.1515100-3-jo...
BTW, unfortunately, Board ID (ADC value) for ROCK 5B is not fixed...
Best regards,
-- FUKAUMI Naoki Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Cheers, Quentin