
30 Oct
2019
30 Oct
'19
2:48 a.m.
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 06:29, Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com wrote:
Prepare the way for a managed CLK API by handling NULL pointers without crashing nor failing.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot@ti.com
drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/clk.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This increases code size so can we make it a Kconfig option?
Why is someone calling these functions with NULL?
Regards, Simon