Hi Bin,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
The call to pci_eth_init() should not be wrapped with CONFIG_TSEC_ENET.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c b/board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c index 586dacc..71a7bb5 100644 --- a/board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c +++ b/board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c @@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ int checkboard(void) return 0; }
-#ifdef CONFIG_TSEC_ENET int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis) { +#ifdef CONFIG_TSEC_ENET struct fsl_pq_mdio_info mdio_info; struct tsec_info_struct tsec_info[4]; int num = 0; @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis)
fsl_pq_mdio_init(bis, &mdio_info); tsec_eth_init(bis, tsec_info, num);+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI pci_eth_init(bis);
This is still needed even with what Stephen Warren and Simon Glass are discussing here, right?
If so... Acked-by: Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com
@@ -257,7 +258,6 @@ int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis)
return 0;} -#endif
#define USBMUX_SEL_MASK 0xc0
#define USBMUX_SEL_UART2 0xc0
1.8.2.1
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot