I'm ok if you take them. I should be doing a push today, so either way works for me.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/13/2012 06:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
This change reduces the SPL size by removing the redundant syncs produced by out_be32 and just replies on one final sync
Done with:
sed -r '/in_be32/b; s/(out_be32)(([^,]*),\s+(.*))/__raw_writel(\3, \2)/g' -i `git grep --name-only sdram_init nand_spl/`
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock msm@freescale.com
nand_spl/board/freescale/p1010rdb/nand_boot.c | 54 ++++++++++----------- nand_spl/board/freescale/p1023rds/nand_boot.c | 42 ++++++++-------- nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/nand_boot.c | 48 +++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
This should come first if the other patches break without it, to preserve bisectability.
Note that I'm going to try to convert this stuff (at least one board as an example, but hopefully it should be easy enough to do additional boards once the first is done) to the new spl Really Soon Now(tm), so it doesn't make much sense to fiddle around with the old stuff right now unless I miss the merge window. I'll incorporate these changes into the new-spl version. I may do that by applying these patches first, but I'd rather they not go via the mpc85xx tree (and please CC me on NAND patches).
I'm not going to have this working by the end of the merge window, so these patches can go in as is. Andy, do you want to take them or should I?
-Scott