10 Feb
2007
10 Feb
'07
2:18 a.m.
In message 012b01c74ca1$8ee35fe0$01c4af0a@Glamdring you wrote:
If we go my way, then we should be able to have *tested* sam926x support inside U-boot very soon, and while this results in duplication of a small part of the spi code on the source level (no addition to the binary) I believe that the benefit to the community of at91sam926x users of having native support in U-Boot outweighs this duplication a lot.
And once it's in, who guarantees to clean it up later? And when?
We are not introducing any new interfaces here,
But we're adding to the mess of duplicated code.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"Spock, did you see the looks on their faces?"
"Yes, Captain, a sort of vacant contentment."