On 09/12/2011 05:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 04:40:34 Greg Ungerer wrote:
--- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h
+int ks8695_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis);
so you say the func needs bd_t* ...
--- a/board/cm4008/cm4008.c +++ b/board/cm4008/cm4008.c --- a/board/cm41xx/cm41xx.c +++ b/board/cm41xx/cm41xx.c
+int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis) +{
- return ks8695_eth_initialize();
+}
but you dont pass it in the board funcs ...
--- a/drivers/net/ks8695eth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ks8695eth.c
+int ks8695_eth_initialize(void)
nor does the func itself even take it ...
not sure how this compiles ? do none of these files include netdev.h ? if they don't, i don't see how it compiles cleanly as that means you'd get warnings about implicit func prototypes ...
It compiled with a warning. Wolfgang fixed it in a follow-up patch.
Regards Greg