On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, January 17, 2014 at 03:41:45 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki wrote:
Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaganna@xilinx.com Cc: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c index 1f1bb36..9650486 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c @@ -381,8 +381,7 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_read_ops(struct spi_flash *flash, u32 offset, }
cmdsz = SPI_FLASH_CMD_LEN + flash->dummy_byte;
cmd = malloc(cmdsz);memset(cmd, 0, cmdsz);
cmd = calloc(1, cmdsz); cmd[0] = flash->read_cmd;What exactly will happen here when calloc() fails ? :-)
(that means, please check the return value ;-) )
Yes - will take care that. thanks!