On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Andre,
On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com wrote:
Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing reg property in that node. Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com
board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot dts wrt Linux dts sync.
Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel, should be fixed in the kernel. The kernel dtc is what we're using, and is/will/can also complain about it.
Yes, this can be true if the node changes are more common in between.
thanks!