Jagan,
thanks for your review!
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 July 2016 at 00:00, Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer moritz.fischer@ettus.com
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c index 4f37e33..8ae4eea 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { {"M25P64", 0x202017, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25P128", 0x202018, 0x0, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_NORM, 0}, {"M25PX64", 0x207117, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},
{"N25Q016A", 0x20bb15, 0x1000, 64 * 1024, 32, RD_NORM, SECT_4K},Why would we need this ext_id (0x1000) here? I understand this is true number for this part but it shouldn't require for probe or require somewhere else?
You're right. I just sent v3.
Cheers,
Moritz