
Hi Bin,
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 08:19, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom, Simon,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:13 PM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 07:03:47PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 6:37 PM Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
When the video framebuffer comes from the bloblist, we should not change relocaddr to this address, since it interfers with the normal memory
typo: interferes
allocation.
This fixes a boot loop in qemu-x86_64
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Fixes: 5bc610a7d9d ("common: board_f: Pass frame buffer info from SPL to u-boot") Suggested-by: Nikhil M Jain n-jain1@ti.com
Changes in v3:
- Reword the Kconfig help as suggested
Changes in v2:
- Add a Kconfig as the suggested conditional did not work
common/board_f.c | 3 ++- drivers/video/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c index 7d2c380e91e..5173d0a0c2d 100644 --- a/common/board_f.c +++ b/common/board_f.c @@ -419,7 +419,8 @@ static int reserve_video(void) if (!ho) return log_msg_ret("blf", -ENOENT); video_reserve_from_bloblist(ho);
gd->relocaddr = ho->fb;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIDEO_RESERVE_SPL))
gd->relocaddr = ho->fb; } else if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(VIDEO)) { ulong addr; int ret;
diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig index b41dc60cec5..f2e56204d52 100644 --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig @@ -1106,6 +1106,15 @@ config SPL_VIDEO_REMOVE if this option is enabled video driver will be removed at the end of SPL stage, beforeloading the next stage.
+config VIDEO_RESERVE_SPL
bool
help
This adjusts reserve_video() to redirect memory reservation when it
sees a video handoff blob (BLOBLISTT_U_BOOT_VIDEO). This avoids the
memory used for framebuffer from being allocated by U-Boot proper,
thus preventing any further memory reservations done by U-Boot proper
from overwriting the framebuffer.
if SPL_SPLASH_SCREEN
config SPL_SPLASH_SCREEN_ALIGN
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!
This isn't the right path, we need to test: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230801140414.76216-1-deva...
I can drop this commit and apply Devarsh's one, but looks there are some arguments.
Let me know which one is the preferred approach.
We can take that one at least for now...I have spent enough time trying to explain the problem.
Regards, Simon