On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Simon Schwarz simonschwarzcor@googlemail.com wrote:
Addition: As I read a bit about FDT it does not replace ATAGS (http://elinux.org/Device_Trees) - it is more a supplement to it. So it would not harm to implement minimal ATAGS support and later add the FDT to it.
That was true in an early prototype, but it is not actually true anymore. Passing a DT replaces ATAGs on arm now, and that code is in mainline.
I started a prototype for ATAGS creation by modifying bootm.c - which seems (so long) not be too hard. If this works and doesn't add too much overhead FDT support is not that much a problem IMHO.
Regards Simon
(Sorry Detlev for the repost - forgot the ML...) _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot