
13 Aug
2012
13 Aug
'12
8:59 p.m.
Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Dear Otavio Salvador,
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_boot.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_boot.c index 84d4a17..ddafddb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_boot.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_boot.c @@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ uint8_t mxs_get_bootmode_index(void)
bootmode |= (gpio_get_value(MX28_PAD_LCD_D04__GPIO_1_4) ? 1 : 0) << 4; bootmode |= (gpio_get_value(MX28_PAD_LCD_D05__GPIO_1_5) ? 1 : 0) << 5;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mx28_boot_modes); i++) {
masked = bootmode & mx28_boot_modes[i].boot_mask;
if (masked == mx28_boot_modes[i].boot_pads)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_boot_modes); i++) {
masked = bootmode & mxs_boot_modes[i].boot_mask;
if (masked == mxs_boot_modes[i].boot_pads)
mxs_boot_modes? They're different for mx23 and mx28!
Yes, they're but the structure is the same so we can use same symbol and have a different mxs_boot_modes matrix for each.
Unless we want a single image for mx233 and mx28. Oh well ... for now
Acked-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
break; }
[...]
Rest seems fine
Best regards, Marek Vasut
Best regards, Marek Vasut