On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:53:24PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:48 PM Marek Behún marek.behun@nic.cz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:40:11 +0200 Robert Marko robert.marko@sartura.hr wrote:
To me, it also doesn't make sense to do it like that as what's the purpose of having stuff that is completely unsupported in U-boot in DTS?
It makes sense because the device tree should compeltely describe the device. It doesn't matter if some of it's components don't have U-Boot drivers. Devicetree is independent on sw, and should be the same for Linux, BSD, and U-Boot.
Trust me, I wish this was true, but I don't see it happening anytime soon as bindings will always change but it is something to aspire to.
Also, take a look at other Armada 7k/8k devices, they are all doing it the same way as I am.
Some of them (most?) are, but that's just because we haven't synced them yet.
But you don't need to do it now, IMO, if it would take too much work.
The thing is that you cant just copy/paste the Linux DTS, it won't compile as the SoC DTSI as well as CP DTSI are different. Otherwise having a -u-boot.dtsi would work and I honestly don't have time to sync those and then fix all of the regressions.
The intention is that you copy/paste (well, cp) the DTS files in to U-Boot and then use -u-boot.dtsi to do whatever further is needed.