-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk Sent: 05 April 2007 01:25 To: Ben Warren Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Jerry Van Baren Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Added a custodian status page to denx.de/UBoot
In message 891383.24029.qm@web313.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com you wrote:
I think you should use branches on your local repository,
but not
on the custodian repo. There, I want to see no branches.
Hmmm. I thought branches would provide an excellent way of putting experimental code 'out there' (i.e. code that's not intended for short-term upstream merging). Is this bad?
Wolfgang Now I believe I can push branches to the u-boot-arm repo
(I was reading gu-arm as git-arm - I should use bigger fonts.....)
I was hoping to push each patch that I approved up to the u-boot-arm as a branch, for others to test.
Then I would ask you to merge from it when testing was complete.
Then I would delete that branch when merged.....
Peter