On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com wrote:
Remove the predefined static initialization and generate the map dynamically to reduce code size.
This patch benefits were pointed out by Peter: http://www.nabble.com/forum/Permalink.jtp?root=25518020&post=25523748&am...
Additional comments from Graeme Russ on x86 support to be removed: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--U-Boot---PATCH-v2--DLMALLOC%3A%21X86%3A-add-av_...
Tested on SDP3430 ONLY. Following code seem to explicitly call this: lib_avr32/board.c lib_blackfin/board.c lib_m68k/board.c lib_mips/board.c lib_nios2/board.c lib_nios/board.c lib_ppc/board.c lib_sh/board.c lib_sparc/board.c These unfortunately could not be tested
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Cc: Peter Tyser ptyser@xes-inc.com Cc: Graeme Russ graeme.russ@gmail.com Cc: Sandeep Paulraj s-paulraj@ti.com Cc: Tom Rix tom.rix@windriver.com
common/dlmalloc.c | 27 ++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/dlmalloc.c b/common/dlmalloc.c index 241db8c..9039b3e 100644 --- a/common/dlmalloc.c +++ b/common/dlmalloc.c
[snip]
@@ -1520,20 +1502,23 @@ void *sbrk(ptrdiff_t increment) return (void *)old; }
-#ifndef CONFIG_X86
This is unrelated to the commit message - Probably best to leave this as-is.
I will submit a patch to remove x86 specifics soon
/*
- x86 boards use a slightly different init sequence thus they implement
- their own version of mem_malloc_init()
*/ void mem_malloc_init(ulong start, ulong size) {
u8 i;av_[0] = av_[1] = 0;for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)av_[2 + i * 2] = av_[2 + i * 2 + 1] = bin_at(i);mem_malloc_start = start; mem_malloc_end = start + size; mem_malloc_brk = start; memset((void *)mem_malloc_start, 0, size);} -#endif
Ditto
/* field-extraction macros */
-- 1.6.0.4