Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Is there any chance that the stuff posted by miaofng will be available in u-boot-next?
I'm not really sure. As Wolfgang Grandegger already commented, the implementation is really heavy for a mere boot loader. Sharing code with Linux is generally a good thing, but it has to fit, too. I'm not convinced it fits here. Let's see wht the now following discussion gives. In any case, this is too green for "next". IMHO it would even bee too green for "staging" if we had something like this (which we don't have :-)
In fact it's not so heavy, it is not socket can architecture based!!! I copied some of linux socket can based ->driver part<- of codes and added a small wrapped layer(by myself) only because i am too lazy to rewrite the sja1000 driver.
For blocked or unblocked access problem, it does support both. To me, i agree mike's view if i write the sja1000 driver from scratch:)